CLOSE CALL WITH BAILOUTS AT HOUSE FIRE

On April 20, 2025, at 1007, crews were dispatched for reports of a house on fire with glass exploding and unknown if it is occupied. The initial responding crews were Engine 11 with 4, Medic 12 with 2, and Ladder 13 with 3. On arrival, crews found heavy fire on the first floor with flames visible on A and B sides of the 2 story structure. Crews were able to confirm that none of the residents were home. Crews made entry into the first floor to extinguish the fire and then withdrew to allow for the basement area to be accessed from the exterior door on side C. Smoke was visible from the roof line, gable ends, and eaves. The 2nd alarm had already been sent. The 2nd alarm added additional engine companies and medic units from neighboring departments. The fire had progressed to the attic space through void spaces in the many different roof lines of the 2-story home. The older home had been modified over the years and presented a lot of hidden spaces and small attic areas. Multiple crews had made their way upstairs to pull the ceiling and expose the attic fire. Several windows on the second story were also removed and horizontal ventilation was in place without the support of a coordinated fire attack. Interior conditions deteriorated leading to an evacuation order when crews reported they had a fire in the stairwell, and the sounding of the air horn. Interior crews were unable to reach the stairwell because of fire conditions. Crews were able to bail through the second story window onto a ground ladder that was previously placed in the area. Three members were evaluated at the local emergency room and later released with only minor burn injuries to the wrists of one member. Accountability was confirmed and operations were changed to defensive.

For this incident, the initial arriving officer took command. That was later transferred to the first arriving, off duty chief. The engine company officer then became operations while the chief maintained command and accountability. A safety officer was later designated as additional resources arrived, and a dedicated RIT crew was assigned.

LESSONS LEARNED:

The first lesson learned was the location of the command post. Command was located too close to the structure. This inhibited the ability to visualize the changing smoke conditions on the C side of the structure. There should have also been a designated C side sector command that would have been able to relay the changing conditions to the command. Additionally, all members on scene should be trained to say something when you see something. Further evaluation of footage from the incident shows that smoke conditions on the 2nd story and roof line significantly changed approximately 4 minutes prior to the evacuation order. Command was unable to see this because of the wind speeds and direction. A sector command on the C side would have been able to observe the changes.
Several crews had rotated through the second story during the operations. None of the crew had advanced the hose line to the second story. Crews initially felt they were only doing overhaul. One crew was specifically assigned to advance the line upstairs and assist with the operations. This crew did not, or could not, complete the assignment and never conveyed that information to operations. Multiple hose lines were placed around the structure, but only 1 was interior on the first floor.

Horizontal ventilation was initiated by interior crews. This was not coordinated through operations nor coordinated with fire attack and a hose line. This was completed on the windward side of the structure and further intensified the oxygenation of the fire.

Radio communication was limited and a lot of face-to-face communication was done. This was because of the proximity of the command post. Had the command post been located more remote, then radio communications would have been enhanced, and crews would have been forced to use the radios. Along with that, interior crews should have notified command of their locations as they advanced through the structure. At the time of the evacuation order, command knew that 6 members should have been operating on the second floor. The reality was that only 4 were on the 2nd floor. The crew that was unable to advance the hose line never made it to the second floor as directed.

Initial crews focused on their foundational training. Ground ladders were placed on all sides of the structure without a single order being given. This further enhanced the safety of the fireground and ensured the evacuation of the members that were trapped in deteriorating conditions.